March 27, 2017

Multibaggers- How to Spot ?- Moneycontrol Link

Selling Mohta Finance, Jk Synthetics, Sterlite Optical, Sterlite Communication , Surya Agroil, Others

Selling (Physical )

Restile ceramcs

Sterlite optical

Mohta finance

Surya agroil

JK synthetics

Shree vani sugar

Sterlite communication.


 M no. 8209158835

Polson - Share Price Shoots Up


OLD POST  2013

May 20, 2013

Polson Limited - Rare Share - Hidden Gem ???

Polson Limied

Company Incorporated in 1939 - Public -1948

Listed at BSE ( Rs. 50 Paid ) - Very Rarely Traded . ( Trading in small quantities presently )

Polson Butter was very popular brand before Amul came into being and the Dairy Sector was reserved for the Co-operative Sector.

For the Polson Brand :-

Company Website

Presently , Polson Limited is an asset laden and highly profitable company

Financial Highlights :

Share Capital : Rs. 60 Lakh

Face Value Per Share : Rs. 50

EPS : Around Rs. 368 ( 2011-12 ) Per Share ( Rs. 50 Paid Up )

For First 9 Months ( 01-04-12 to 31-12-12  Rs, 385

Book Value ( 31-03-12 ) Rs. 2452 Per Share (  Rs. 50 Paid Up )

Balance Sheet ( 2011-12 )

Profit / Loss ( 2011-12 )

Annual Report ( 2011-12 )

There is a good chance that the Company may revive its very popular brand of Polson Butter

The Promoters holding is nearly 85 %

. So, there can be delisting at a very attractive Exit Rate

For History and Terrific Brand Popularity of POLSON , Please study the following facts from a Court order ( 1994 )


Facts leading to the filing of these two applications, in brief, are that in the year 1888, one Seth Pestunji Edulji Polson had started business of selling coffee in Bombay and in 1900, he started using the trade mark 'Polson' which was part of his name for selling coffee. Subsequently, he expanded his business and in about 1915 he had started marketing and selling butter, cheese, flour, etc. besides coffee under the said trade mark 'Polson'. It is the case of the plaintiff that the brand 'Polson' became immensely popular due to its high quality goods. 'Polson' rather became synonymous with quality butter being marketed under the said name in the minds of the people. In about 1930, he had developed a modern dairy at Anand (Gujarat) by the name of Poison Model Dairy which inter-alia produced butter under mechanised process. In the year 1938, Polson Private Limited was incorporated to further expand the business of said Polson.
(3) So, it is averred in the plaint that for over a period of time, the said company became a pioneer in the establishment and development of dairy sector and played a significant role in the development of "agmark Scheme" by the Central Government. The plaintiff expanded its activities to the eastern part of India in 1950 when it established a pilot plant in Khagaul in Bihar. Another dairy was established at Digha Ghat near Patna. in the year 1957. It is also averred that the plaintiff also started dealing in tea in 1963. So, it is averred that plaintiff's commercial activities spanned from coffee and tea to flour, table creamery, butter, etc. which were all sold under the trade mark 'Polson' which continues to be House-Mark and Corporate Name of the plaintiff company. Reliance has been placed by the plaintiff with regard to all these facts on plaintiff's brochure that was published on its 75th Anniversary (1888-1963) as well as in the In- House Journals "Poison Trading" published in various years. The plaintiff had given the sale figures which ran into crores every year for the years 1966 to 1978.
(4) It is averred that due to certain policy decision taken by the Central Government, the dairy sector witnessed sharp changes as under the Government policy, the dairy business was reserved for the Co-operative Sectors and certain restrictions were gradually imposed on the free operations of the private sector dairy corporations. It is alleged that in 1965, the Collector of Kaira District in Gujarat restrained the plaintiff company from taking out butter produced in Gujarat by the plaintiff outside the said district. The major plant of the plaintiff was situated in that district. Later on, after some negotiations, the plaintiff was permitted to remove only 1200 tones of butter from that district against an installed capacity of 2184 tones. Later on, the said quantity which was allowed to be taken out from the district was scaled down to only 600 tones a year. So, it is alleged that under such circumstances, the plaintiff's dairy operations in Eastern India had to be suspended and as the plaintiff's dairy business became totally uneconomical due to such restrictions being imposed under the Government policy, the plaintiff had to suspend its dairy operations since 1978 onwards. But the plaintiff continued to market its other products under his trade/corporate name Polson Limited which is evident from the copies of the balance-sheet of the years 1989-90 and 1990-91. Reference has also been made to these facts in the Polson Today in- house journal published in October to December 1972.
(5) It is also claimed by the plaintiff that in the year 1972, the plaintiff company, in order to diversify its activities, had acquired Amba Tannin & Pharmaceutical which had a running business of manufacturing Chemicals which became a division of Poison Limited in which a turnover of Rs-2.5 crores A year has been in existence.
(6) Now due to liberalisation policy of the Ministry of Agriculture, in August 1993, the plaintiff finalised its plans to restart its dairy operations including manufacture and sale of butter, cheese, etc. and to market the same again under the existing trademark and corporate name 'Polson' and plaintiff is stated to have taken various steps like acquiring plant and machinery in Kolhapur in this regard. It is also claimed by the plaintiff that plaintiff had registered its trademark 'Polson' for dairy products which has been renewed from time to time as plaintiff had never any intention of abandoning this trademark. The plaintiff has referred to eight trademarks which it had registered in between the period 1st July 1946 to 1st October 1952 which stand renewed up to date and it is asserted that all the said registrations are under the trademark 'Polson' for variety of products of the plaintiff company and the same are valid and subsisting on the register of the trademarks.


Polson Limited seems to be a Hidden Gem and  ideal of Collector Investors


May 12, 2016

Polson Rights Issue Closes on 25/05/2016

Opens 11/05/16

Closes 25/05/16

Ratio 31 shares for every 39 shares

@ Rs.5600 ( Rs.50 paid up share )


Important Excerpts from Rights Offer ( 2016 ) 

1. SEBI has vide its order dated June 04, 2013, frozen some of the voting rights and corporate benefits of our Promoter GroupSEBI had vide its circular dated June 04, 2010, amended the Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules, 1957 (SCRR), whereby it amended Rule 19(2)(b) and introduced Rule 19A. In terms of the requirements set forth in the newly introduced Rule 19A, every listed company was required to maintain shareholding of at least 25%. The Rule further stated that listed company which had public shareholding below 25% was required to increase its public shareholding to atleast 25% within a period of 3 years. Further, SEBI vide its order no. WTM/PS/08/CFD/JUNE/2013 dated June 04, 2013, had passed certain directions against the promoters/ promoters group and directors of the non-compliant companies, whose names are mentioned in the said order. Accordingly, in terms of the said order, SEBI has frozen some of the voting rights and corporate benefits of the Promoter Group of the Company, prohibited the promoters/promoters group and directors of the Company from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in securities of the Company, either directly or indirectly, restrained the shareholders forming part of promoter/promoter group of the Company from holding any new position as a director in any listed company and restrained the Directors of the Company from holding any new position as a Director in any listed Company. However, SEBI may in future take any other action against the Company, its Promoters and/or its Directors including but not limited to levying monetary penalty under adjudication proceedings, initiating criminal proceedings by way of prosecution proceedings and any other action/direction as it may deem appropriate. 

2. The trading of equity shares of our company was suspended from BSE Limited for approximately a decade. Our Company’s shares are listed on BSE Limited. The scrip of company was suspended from trading on the BSE w.e.f. April 2002 for giving effect to reduction of share capital of the Company. However, on account of negligence on part of the Company the suspension got revoked only on January 04, 2012. This caused immense hardship to the shareholders who did not have liquidity for their investment in Polson for almost a decade. We cannot assure you that such an event may not occur again.

4. We do not have access to records and data pertaining to certain historical legal and secretarial information, including with respect to issuance of shares and amendments in our MoA. We have been unable to locate many of our important corporate records. Our Company was incorporated on December 21, 1938 and the management of our Company was transferred to the current Promoters of the Company in the year 1970. For the years 1938 to 2013 many important records and documents, including forms filed with the Registrar of Companies, Minutes books, Statutory Registers, Documents relating to the IPO of the Company, Takeover of the Company, Share Transfers, documents evidencing the amendments to our MoA, issue of shares, changes in capital structure etc. are not available. Whilst we believe that material information required for Investors to make their investment decision in this Issue has been disclosed to the extent possible in this Draft Letter of Offer, we are unable to make certain disclosures required under the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations in this Draft Letter of Offer.

5. We do not own the trademark and unauthorised parties may infringe upon or misappropriate our intellectual property. This could have a material adverse effect on our business which in turn may adversely affect our results of operations The trademark is not yet registered in name of our Company. We had made an application for registration of our trademark under classes 01 to 45 to the Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai by an application dated January 17, 2011. The application for our trademark has been objected by the Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai and the examination report reflects that the Trade Mark application is open to objection on relative grounds of refusal under Section 11 of the Act because the same/similar trade mark(s) is/are already on record of the register for the same or similar goods/services. The same has been replied to by the Company vide its replies dated September 26, 2012 and December 24, 2012. However, the same is pending further revert from the Registry. There is no assurance that the application for the registration of our trademark will be approved by the Trade Marks Registry, Mumbai. If we are unable to obtain registration of our trademark we may not be able to successfully enforce or protect our intellectual property rights and obtain statutory protections available under the Trade Mark Act, 1999, as otherwise available for registered marks. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, which in turn may adversely affect our results of operations. 6. The Company does not own its corporate office from which it operates. The Company does not own the premises on which its corporate office is located. The Company's Corporate Office is located on a premise which is owned by one of the Promoter Group Companies and is used by the Company on rental basis. Further, The Memorandum of Understanding for its Registered Office is not registered as per the requirements of Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. For more information see "Business Overview " on page 49 of this Draft Letter of Offer.

Source :-

Letter of Offer ( Draft ) Rights Issue 2016 

General Warning : Investment in Shares Can be Injurious to Your  WEALTH

Caution :The blog writer has personal/ family members' holdings in this Company ,  so please make suitable "provisions " for likely over optimism

( NB : All information given in good faith. Please recheck all facts before taking any investment decision.

. No responsibility taken by this author / blog . )

Midland Rubber- Offer For Buy back

Blog Disclaimer- Message Received From an Investor - Please Recheck - No Responsibility With Blog


Midland Rubber Company seems to be Unlisted


An investor has informed that a buy back offer has been made at an " attractive " rate. 

Digvijay Finlease- Were Shares Allotted to Promoters in 1998 ? - Message Received- Please Recheck

 Blog Disclaimer- Message Received From an Investor - Please Recheck - No Responsibility With Blog


In 1998 dfl Capital was around 4cr and at present 11.44cr

And capital is raised on preferential base/rights and they have not allotted any additional share to the share holder

Only promoters share holding has risen

Because of this general public share holder is in minority and promoters stake is risen

The change in capital from 4cr to 11.44cr they have not shown in balance sheet.


old post

March 22, 2017

Digvijay Finlease- Consolidation of Shares-to Rs.1000

Digvijay Finlease ( Unlisted ) is consolidating the Face Value of its share from Rs. 10 paid to Rs.1000.

100 shares of Rs. 10 = One share of Rs. 1000

All those share holders with Fractions would be paid @ Rs.200 for Rs. 10 share

EGM Resolution. Click + To Enlarge

This is a highly anti Non Promoter / Small Shareholder move which should be opposed by all Investors at every forum including Courts, SEBI, Investors Associations .

Digvijay Finlease is an Asset Laden Holding Company of Beni Gopal Bangur Group . It holds Promoters ' shares in Shree Cement , NBI Industrial Finance etc.

Please also click


Shree Cement was originally promoted by Shree Digvijay Cement Co. Limited. 

In 1983, Beawar ( Rajasthan ) Cement Licence was originally given by the Govt. to Shree Digvijay Cement.

Bangurs transferred it to a new Company- Shree Cement ( Name Shree from Shree Digvijay )

Shares of Digvijay Finlease were given to shareholders of Shree Digvijay Co.after transferring Shri Digvijay's holding to it of Shree Cement shares.

Digvijay Finlease 's NAV has been calculated , by some to be above Rss.25,000 / Rs. 10 share ( PLEASE RECALCULATE INDEPENDENTLY/ No Responsibility  )

Digvijay Finlease 's fellow Holding Company NBI Industrial Finance has ,  recently , Relisted at NSE and its CMP is Rs.4500.

It is very sad that when Sheholders of Digvijay Finlease were demanding Listing in NSE / BSE , Promoters have chosen this cheap tactic to deprive small shareholders of their shares at a minuscule fraction of the True Worth ( NAV )

Also , please click


Consolidation of Face Value to a Higher Denomination SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE.

This Cheap / Anti Small Holder Tactic was earlier used by

Binani Metals

Recently , by Rasoi






( Josh Malihabadi )

Saadda Haq , Ethey Rakh


Blog Caution : PLEASE RECHECK All Information Before Taking Any Investment Decision.

March 25, 2017

IP Gupta Buying/Selling Bharti Telecom, Modern Insulators, Mideast Integrated, Frick India, Carrier, Others

We are buying & selling the following shares :
1. Bharti Telecom Limited

2. Tata Technologies Limited

3. Modern Insulators Limited

4. Mideast Integrated Steels Limited

5. Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd (Dabur Pharma ltd)

6. Carrier Airconditioning & Refrigeration Limited

7. Essar Steel Limited

8. Philips India Limited & Philips Lightning Limited

9. Vadilal Chemicals Limited

10. The Hindustan Times limited (Physical Form, Only Buying)

11. Essar Oil Limited

12. Frick India Limited

13. Delhi Flour Mills (Only Buying)

14. Hero Fincorp Limited (Only Buying)

15. Essar Ports Limited (Only Buying)
Must Do enquiry. Very attractive prices.
I P Gupta


Dealers of Rare Indian Shares 


Sambhav Aggarwal
Arms Securities
Tel      : +919899131155


08866004076 - Whatsapp also 


08108303330 or


Vipul Gandhi
Gandhi Associates
25 , New Jagnath , Saptabhumi Apt.,( G.F.)
Tel 0281-3046757 /3057667
(m)  093755- 77007
Web : 

Dilip Surana
Strides Financial Services
"Arihant Plaza"
84-85,Wall Tax Road, Ist floor
Park Town, Above SBI
CHENNAI 600003
Phone No 044-25350312, 25350313
Fax No  044-42371148
Mobile 9840278351      95000 95121


Tel : 011 - 47085000- 05

Tel :- +919811119970, +919821644180

Vikas Aggarwal 


IP Gupta ,( Faridabad )
Mobile - 9971104447, 9899220695, 8010266990
Email id - 
Cell 08905537733


Contact: 022-67809990
Toll Free: 1800 209 2929

Tenrose Capital Services Ltd, Cochin

Tel - 0484- 2401685 ; 2401684 ( m ) 09388603877

Pradeep Jain

Nirej V Paul, AKHIL SECURITIES | 3/D2, 2nd Floor | Saniya Plaza |
Near KSRTC Bus Stand | Cochin 35 | Kerala |
Office  : 0484 4032952, 6596725 |
Mobile : 09447577160 |

Integrated Fincap Pvt. Limited
1111 , Indraprakash ,
21 ,Barakhamba Road ,
 New Delhi-110001

Toll Free : 1800-111-110

Ph. :011-23351793 , 23357089
( m ) 098110 - 65464
VisionFINANCIAL Services ,
S 183, GK II,
New Delhi 110048

( m ) 099990-07345 - Keshav Goyal

email :


M - 9825796997

Shreeji Investments , Ahmedabad

Bhavin Leua
(M / Whatsapp )9033476634 (contact preferably on whatsapp)

Kirit N Vaghela,
Himatnagar ( North Gujarat ) 
 M / Whats App No. 99240 61501

Dhruval shah - 8000133721/9898150967
Address:- shyamal cross road satellite ahmedabad 380015

Sagar Shah


Sanket K Vaghela,

 Himatnagar  ( Gujarat )

( m ) 097374-28953

email :

Investor Service Centre ,
080-26607090,26607058 (m) 078150-22551 . 078150-22552
email :

Harish Mittal 09867303077

 Pankil Shah 9898616232

Jay Shah Mumbai 09870879190

FINWIZ SERVICES, Mumbai-Mobile: 8080160094


Chirag share Consultants. Ahmedabad 
Whats up no.8153045144


Coolraj Sakhlecha

333 MINT ST.,
CHENNAI 600 001
CELL   09841557344
PH  -    04425388750.  email :

( List Incomplete - To be Expanded )