January 03, 2012

Let Bennett Coleman Group Clarifify

tridev said... Well, the buying is for real....the price is what you can extract, based on the volume on offer. And nobody will pay Rs 10000 for an listed, but illiquid holding company, unless one is sure of what one is getting into....based on what i know, the 2-3 operators who are buying shares have acquired 1-3% of the outstanding shares in these companies....and have invested tens of crores. So nobaody spends that kind of money, without being sure of the endgame

============================================================================


Blog Writer : Many opinions have been voiced regarding the possible reasons behind the Share Price rise in Bennett Coleman And Co. 's ( Samir Jain Group ) holding companies like Bharat Nidhi , PNB Finance , Camac etc.

Times of India Group , including Economic Times And ET Now is World 's leading disseminator of news and knowledge. So , investors expect the Times Group to clarify as to what is happening regarding their Group and Holding  companies. Let us put all speculations to rest.

11 comments:

Yamla Jat said...

We will be living in fool paradise if we believe that one two percent of the equity can be the game changer.

Hitesh Singal said...

Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Pilani was a good example, followed by Natraj which was trading for 150 got listed at 60

This blog is fanning false hopes. Keep up the good work.

vishwaas said...

With their financial might Bennet group can simply wipe off 1/2 percent holders like fly

Anonymous said...

I think it is not quoted by tridev but by the people who are jacking up the price

The Informer said...

When Indian promoters have no damm respect for the institutions who hold 20%-30% of the company stock, I agree with vishwaas, who cares for those few percentages here and there.

People are treating this stock demigod.At some point, investors will begin to focus on capital preservation and not capital speculation. Clearly we're not at that point today.

Hetal said...

The tumultuous fall in price of BNL will not leave any prosperous survivors this time around

Satyakam Mishra said...

Management cannot regulate market prices, although it can, by its disclosures and policies, encourage rational behavior by market participants. My own preference, as perhaps you’d guess, is for a market price that consistently approximates business value.

Given that association, all promoters prosper precisely as the business prospers during their period of ownership. Wild swings in market prices far above and below business value do not change the final gains for owners in aggregate; in the end, investor gains must equal business gains. Asian Paints, Colgate India, Bosch India etc are good examples.

But long periods of substantial undervaluation and/or overvaluation will cause the gains of the business to be inequitably distributed among various owners, with the investment result of any given promoters is largely depending upon how lucky, shrewd, or stupid he happens to be.

Dristhi Goel said...

All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost; the old that is strong does not wither, deep roots are not reached by the frost.

Rashid said...

Mr Agarwal, Why are you so biased that you dont allow to propagate the truth.

One of my freind wrote a mail to you regading some issues and you did not put it.

Really you share some cosy relationsips with the brokers.

SilverMani said...

Mr Agarwal as a rule, is not at all amenable to criticism or correction; but I think your effort might be so poor that I feel constrained to advice you to make some effort to improve it

Dristhi Goel said...

I am a don don 2